In late 1999, the LNPA WG established a "problem identification and management process" (PIM) for LNP issues. The LNPA WG is not responsible for resolving all LNP problems. The LNPA WG does an initial evaluation of each LNP problem submitted, then either develops a resolution for the issue or refers the issue to the appropriate forum for resolution. The status of each LNP issue submitted is reported to the NANC on a regular basis.
The LNPA WG has developed issue submittal guidelines, an issue submittal form, process flows, and a tracking mechanism. Issues should be submitted to the LNPA WG, using the issue submittal form, at least two weeks before the LNPA WG meeting at which LNP issue's discussion is desired. 2009-08-03 PIM Conference Call Notes.pdf
| Title | Date | Description | Document |
|---|---|---|---|
| PIM 102 | 08/22/2017 | During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These i... | Download |
| PIM 101 | 08/22/2017 | During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These i... | Download |
| PIM 100 | 08/04/2017 | During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These i... | Download |
| PIM 99 | 08/04/2017 | During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These i... | Download |
| PIM 98 | 08/04/2017 | During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These i... | Download |
| PIM 97 | 07/31/2017 | During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These i... | Download |
| PIM 96 | 07/31/2017 | During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These i... | Download |
| PIM 95 | 07/11/2017 | During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These i... | Download |
| PIM 94 | 07/11/2017 | During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These i... | Download |
| PIM 93 | 07/11/2017 | During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These i... | Download |
| PIM 92 | 07/11/2017 | During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These i... | Download |
| PIM 91 | 07/11/2017 | During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These i... | Download |
| PIM 90 | 07/11/2017 | During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These i... | Download |
| PIM 89 | 07/11/2017 | During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These i... | Download |
| PIM 88 | 07/12/2016 | Some Service Providers do not have a contact number to assist with porting fallout questions. Instead, the carriers rely on e-mail. There are not any documented guidelines around using email for ... | Download |
| PIM 87 | 03/30/2016 | LNPA WG Best Practices reflect the consensus of the working group regarding the preferred processes for porting. Best Practice 0004, N-1 Carrier Methodology Clarification, was originally submitted... | Download |
| PIM 86 | 05/12/2015 | Originally submitted as per below, seeking consensus to amend the scope of this PIM to address overall challenges related to claims of an unauthorized port in order to develop one cohesive PIM and ... | Download |
| PIM 85 | 04/01/2015 | Consumers are experiencing negative porting experiences as a result of the lack of uniformity and clarity in processes that drives port completion timeframes. We are allowing resellers to validate ... | Download |
| PIM 84 | 12/05/2014 | There is not an industry defined process interval for Wireless to Wireline and Wireless to Wireless reseller ports. Reseller ports are not considered simple ports, they are complex. There is not... | Download |
| PIM 83 | 01/06/2015 | Initially, a request was made by a number of Service Providers in the LNPA Working Group for Neustar to create a report that reflects all wireless Service Providers that have Long T1 and T2 Timers ... | Download |
| PIM 82 | 10/30/2012 | Due to the automated processing of large quantities of ports, there are occasions (rare, but can happen) that an Old Provider may have auto-issued a FOC and then their downstream systems may discov... | Download |
| PIM 81 | 10/16/2012 | It has come to the attention of Providers that a New Provider is using an NPAC modify message to unilaterally move up the port due date once the T1/T2 timers have been stopped due to both matching ... | Download |
| PIM 80 | 10/04/2010 | A significant quantity of ported/pooled NPAC database records currently contain LRNs that are in a different LATA than their associated ported/pooled telephone numbers (TNs). This is resulting in ... | Download |
| PIM 79 | 09/07/2010 | Item 1.) Url link inside BP36 which says, | Download |
| PIM 78 | 03/05/2010 | Per LNPA WG Recommendations, carriers will use the “standardized” LSR as developed by OBF for simple wireline-to-wireline and intermodal ports to support 1DP. Small carriers have until Feb. 2, 201... | Download |
126 results returned
© 2019 iconectiv, all rights reserved
