Problems and Issues Management

In late 1999, the LNPA WG established a "problem identification and management process" (PIM) for LNP issues. The LNPA WG is not responsible for resolving all LNP problems. The LNPA WG does an initial evaluation of each LNP problem submitted, then either develops a resolution for the issue or refers the issue to the appropriate forum for resolution. The status of each LNP issue submitted is reported to the NANC on a regular basis.

The LNPA WG has developed issue submittal guidelines, an issue submittal form, process flows, and a tracking mechanism. Issues should be submitted to the LNPA WG, using the issue submittal form, at least two weeks before the LNPA WG meeting at which LNP issue's discussion is desired. 2009-08-03 PIM Conference Call Notes.pdf


Related Documents


Title Date Description Document
PIM 102 08/22/2017 During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These i... Download
PIM 101 08/22/2017 During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These i... Download
PIM 100 08/04/2017 During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These i... Download
PIM 99 08/04/2017 During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These i... Download
PIM 98 08/04/2017 During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These i... Download
PIM 97 07/31/2017 During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These i... Download
PIM 96 07/31/2017 During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These i... Download
PIM 95 07/11/2017 During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These i... Download
PIM 94 07/11/2017 During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These i... Download
PIM 93 07/11/2017 During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These i... Download
PIM 92 07/11/2017 During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These i... Download
PIM 91 07/11/2017 During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These i... Download
PIM 90 07/11/2017 During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These i... Download
PIM 89 07/11/2017 During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These i... Download
PIM 88 07/12/2016 Some Service Providers do not have a contact number to assist with porting fallout questions. Instead, the carriers rely on e-mail. There are not any documented guidelines around using email for ... Download
PIM 87 03/30/2016 LNPA WG Best Practices reflect the consensus of the working group regarding the preferred processes for porting. Best Practice 0004, N-1 Carrier Methodology Clarification, was originally submitted... Download
PIM 86 05/12/2015 Originally submitted as per below, seeking consensus to amend the scope of this PIM to address overall challenges related to claims of an unauthorized port in order to develop one cohesive PIM and ... Download
PIM 85 04/01/2015 Consumers are experiencing negative porting experiences as a result of the lack of uniformity and clarity in processes that drives port completion timeframes. We are allowing resellers to validate ... Download
PIM 84 12/05/2014 There is not an industry defined process interval for Wireless to Wireline and Wireless to Wireless reseller ports. Reseller ports are not considered simple ports, they are complex. There is not... Download
PIM 83 01/06/2015 Initially, a request was made by a number of Service Providers in the LNPA Working Group for Neustar to create a report that reflects all wireless Service Providers that have Long T1 and T2 Timers ... Download
PIM 82 10/30/2012 Due to the automated processing of large quantities of ports, there are occasions (rare, but can happen) that an Old Provider may have auto-issued a FOC and then their downstream systems may discov... Download
PIM 81 10/16/2012 It has come to the attention of Providers that a New Provider is using an NPAC modify message to unilaterally move up the port due date once the T1/T2 timers have been stopped due to both matching ... Download
PIM 80 10/04/2010 A significant quantity of ported/pooled NPAC database records currently contain LRNs that are in a different LATA than their associated ported/pooled telephone numbers (TNs). This is resulting in ... Download
PIM 79 09/07/2010 Item 1.) Url link inside BP36 which says, Download
PIM 78 03/05/2010 Per LNPA WG Recommendations, carriers will use the “standardized” LSR as developed by OBF for simple wireline-to-wireline and intermodal ports to support 1DP.  Small carriers have until Feb. 2, 201... Download

126 results returned