In late 1999, the LNPA WG, now known as the Number Portability Industry Forum (NPIF), established a “Problem Identification and Management” process (PIM) for Number Portability (NP) issues. The group, made up of Number Portability Industry members, developed:
The NPIF is not responsible for resolving all NP problems. The NPIF performs an initial evaluation of each problem/issue submitted, then either develops a resolution for the issue or refers it to the appropriate forum for resolution. Issues submitted (PIM) are tracked in the PIMs Tracking Matrix.
Issues should be submitted to the NPIF using the Problem/Issue Identification and Description Form, at least two weeks before the NPIF meeting at which Number Portability issue's discussion is desired.
| Title | Date | Description | Document |
|---|---|---|---|
| PIM 111 | 04/24/2018 | During SPID Migration processing, a local system had issues in processing the SPID Migration files produced by the iconectiv NPAC. The SPID Migration only involved NPA-NXXs being migrated and the ... | Download |
| PIM 110 | 03/12/2018 | In a typical Software Development process, requirements are explicitly defined and numbered so that such requirements can be developed and fully tested and the traceability to verify that every req... | Download |
| PIM 109 | 03/12/2018 | Based on feedback from current users of the Neustar NPAC, there appears to be a need to utilize Hold – Replay functionality for CMIP mechanized users that is not related to those users transitionin... | Download |
| PIM 108 | 03/06/2018 | Based on feedback from a current user of the Neustar NPAC, there appears to be implementation differences between the Neustar and iconectiv NPAC’s implementation of the XML Hold/Replay functionalit... | Download |
| PIM 107 | 03/06/2018 | An issue was raised in the industry concerning documenting and maintaining the MUMP File spreadsheets. The understanding was that the implementation was vendor specific, and the implementations ma... | Download |
| PIM 106 | 03/06/2018 | iconectiv implemented the BDD files based on the NPAC SMS FRS BDD requirements and examples in Appendix E. During certification and regression testing of the iconectiv NPAC vendors and mechanized ... | Download |
| PIM 105 | 02/14/2018 | During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impact the execution and/or verification of an Industry Group Test Case. These issues relate to a nonconform... | Download |
| PIM 104 | 01/26/2018 | Based on feedback from current users of the Neustar NPAC and based on iconectiv’s own experience with BDD files from Neustar, it appears as though full BDD files – though not delta BDD files – may ... | Download |
| PIM 103 | 07/11/2017 | During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These i... | Download |
| PIM 102 | 08/22/2017 | During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These i... | Download |
| PIM 101 | 08/22/2017 | During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These i... | Download |
| PIM 100 | 08/04/2017 | During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These i... | Download |
| PIM 99 | 08/04/2017 | During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These i... | Download |
| PIM 98 | 08/04/2017 | During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These i... | Download |
| PIM 97 | 07/31/2017 | During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These i... | Download |
| PIM 96 | 07/31/2017 | During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These i... | Download |
| PIM 95 | 07/11/2017 | During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These i... | Download |
| PIM 94 | 07/11/2017 | During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These i... | Download |
| PIM 93 | 07/11/2017 | During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These i... | Download |
| PIM 92 | 07/11/2017 | During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These i... | Download |
| PIM 91 | 07/11/2017 | During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These i... | Download |
| PIM 90 | 07/11/2017 | During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These i... | Download |
| PIM 89 | 07/11/2017 | During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These i... | Download |
| PIM 88 | 07/12/2016 | Some Service Providers do not have a contact number to assist with porting fallout questions. Instead, the carriers rely on e-mail. There are not any documented guidelines around using email for ... | Download |
| PIM 87 | 03/30/2016 | LNPA WG Best Practices reflect the consensus of the working group regarding the preferred processes for porting. Best Practice 0004, N-1 Carrier Methodology Clarification, was originally submitted... | Download |
136 results returned
© 2021 iconectiv, all rights reserved
